Episode 46 - Lynette Simms (Dawson) & Chris Dawson (The Teachers Pet Case) Part 2
Summary
The conversation delves into the complex case of Lynette Dawson, who went missing in 1982, and the subsequent investigation that led to her husband Chris Dawson being charged with her murder decades later. The discussion covers personal anecdotes, the impact of media on the case, the role of investigative journalism, and the legal proceedings that followed. The hosts reflect on the societal changes regarding domestic violence and the importance of public interest in seeking justice.
Keywords
Lynette Dawson, Chris Dawson, true crime, podcast, Teachers Pet Podcast, investigation, murder, Australia, media influence, trial, justice
Sources and other links
The Teacher's Pet Podcast, Hedley Thomas and The Australian.
If any of our content is distressing & you need to talk (Australia):
Lifeline Phone: 13 11 14
https://www.lifeline.org.au/
Or please seek assistance in your country
Check us out on our socials for images and updates:
We have set up “Buy Me a Coffee”.
If you'd like to keep us caffeinated (or wined 😉) while we prep our next episode, please feel free to Click Here to buy us a coffee.
Stay curious, crime besties!
Disclaimer:
The content of this podcast is intended for mature audiences. The topics discussed may contain sensitive material related to real-life crimes, violence, and distressing events that may be disturbing or triggering. All opinions expressed are those of the hosts and guests and do not reflect the views of any organisations or entities associated with the production.
While we strive to provide accurate and factual information, true crime stories may involve speculation, theories, and varying interpretations of events. Some details may be presented in a way that is meant to engage and educate rather than to sensationalise.
Listener discretion is advised.
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Context Setting
11:55 The Investigation Begins
23:50 Coronial Inquests and Their Findings
29:56 The Role of Media and Public Interest
35:39 Trial Proceedings and Legal Challenges
36:32 Witness Testimonies and Their Challenges
39:43 The Impact of Media on Trials
42:42 Theories on Lynette's Disappearance
47:43 The Complexity of Relationships and Motives
51:38 Circumstantial Evidence and Its Weight
57:42 Sentencing and Legal Implications
01:06:05 The Role of Investigative Journalism
0:15 Welcome, everybody, to our second part of the Chris Dawson,
0:20 Lynn Dawson, Lynn Sims. There's so many different names
0:24 that we could go for this one, but welcome back to another
0:26 episode. Thanks for joining us again and.
0:28 Yeah. Welcome back, everyone.
0:29 Did you forget what we were doing today?
0:30 Just it took. Me took me a hot minute.
0:32 Although we literally just recorded the first part of this
0:35 episode, so, you know, giving away our trade secrets.
0:38 Can't let your brain fall out just yet?
0:41 No, I've got a little bit left in me, Yeah.
0:44 Then I think we might need to go and get some.
0:45 Lungs. Oh yeah, you could.
0:47 Have you ever had it? Oh, we're so out of practice
0:50 with all of this. Right, we've got this.
0:52 I I reckon we can. Manage.
0:54 Oh, now that's now that that's been that seed's been planted.
0:57 We're good. I'm I'm right.
0:58 I'm here. We're gonna get this done and
1:00 get to lunch. Yay, how are you?
1:03 I I think we were talking in the last episode about how it's been
1:06 your birthday this week, but how's everything else been
1:09 going? Not too bad, not too bad, I feel
1:12 like. The weather has seriously
1:14 changed. We were just saying then these
1:16 outdoor sports over winter are horrific.
1:19 Why, Why do we do outdoor sports in winter?
1:22 Like I feel like it's an Australian thing of like, you
1:24 know, that football, it's a winter sport, soccer's a winter
1:27 sport. Like they're all outdoors.
1:29 Like, why are we not putting out our winter, you know, our cold
1:33 sports, outdoor sports in summer when it's nice to be outside?
1:36 Yeah, I don't know, because it's the kids.
1:38 Bloody love running around in the rain and the mud.
1:42 I'm dreading tonight, like sit standing around at footy
1:46 training, Yeah, it's gonna be so cold.
1:48 It'll be so cold. At least it's not wet.
1:51 It's not gonna be raining tonight, but we will have weeks
1:55 where we'll be standing in the absolute pouring rain.
1:58 Oh, yeah. While it's while they're
1:59 training. Yeah.
1:59 Or while they're playing. Oh.
2:01 The kids love it like they love getting in the mud, like, but I
2:04 don't. Oh no, I'll just put that out
2:06 there. Oh no, no, I'm not here for
2:08 that. No, no thanks.
2:10 It's just freezing. It's horrible.
2:11 Oh, it's. Awful.
2:12 Yeah, on the on the note of it being cold and it's particularly
2:17 being cold overnight the last few nights especially.
2:21 Tell me this, are you one of those psychopaths that sleeps in
2:24 socks? Maybe.
2:27 Are you really? OK, my feet control my body
2:31 temperature entirely, right? If my feet are hot, I am hot.
2:36 If my feet are cold, I am cold. OK.
2:40 So in summer there is nothing I hate more than socks on in bed.
2:45 I am with you on it in summer. But when I get to this cold
2:48 weather and winter, I have to have nice socks warming my feet
2:53 up. The thought of it, yeah, the
2:55 thought of it makes me want to vomit.
2:58 And The thing is in summer, I'm I'm with you, I am with you.
3:00 But when we get these cold, wet, cold weather, I just, I have to
3:04 my feet, literally if my feet aren't warm, I am not warm, OK.
3:09 Yeah, I mean, I don't. Don't get me wrong, I don't like
3:12 having cold feet. Yeah, but I cannot, I just, I
3:18 cannot go to bed with. Socks.
3:19 I think what my issue is in winter is I'm one of those
3:21 people who sticks my feet out of the donor.
3:24 Same. And I can't stick my feet out of
3:26 the donor and keep them warm unless I've got socks on.
3:28 Them but that don't you regulate your body temperature by putting
3:30 your foot out a little bit so this.
3:32 Is no, it's actually like, I know this is the thing.
3:34 I stick my feet out not for regulating my temperature
3:36 because of just habit of having to stick my feet out I think.
3:41 OK interesting. I I can't also wear long pants
3:44 to bed. Oh, yeah, I know.
3:45 I wear long pants to bed. Yeah.
3:47 OK, I should refer them to the shorts.
3:49 Yeah. It's really hard to find pajamas
3:51 that are shorts with a long sleeve top.
3:53 That is because that's wrong you.
3:54 Just don't in. The winter tops with shorts that
3:58 you can find sets. I've got a really nice bond set
4:00 that's like that in the winter. I I do like a long sleeved.
4:05 Because your arms are out. Out.
4:06 Yeah, yeah. But then the way I regulate my
4:09 temperature is by sticking my foot out, and the longer my leg
4:13 goes out, obviously the cooler I need to get.
4:17 The calculations like it's it's very scientist.
4:20 I'll get Mace onto the the mathematical equation of how
4:22 much leg it takes to cook. Could he could you please?
4:25 I reckon he. Takes my ideal bedroom
4:27 temperature. I actually don't know what that
4:29 is. Yeah.
4:29 What would be my ideal bedroom temperature where I can leave my
4:32 legs in the bed all night but not actually get?
4:34 Hot. Yeah, Yeah.
4:36 Thanks, Mace. I'll get him, get him onto it.
4:38 He'll he'll love the problem solving.
4:39 But. Also then in the winter like a
4:41 blanket on top of the do not serious.
4:45 Oh, Nah, 'cause that just irritates because it never goes
4:47 where you want it to go, and I would just lose my mind over it.
4:50 Yeah, no, no. Hey, Dina.
4:52 Yeah, yeah, OK. And I've gotta have something on
4:55 me, no matter how hot it is. Oh, I'm a little bit like that.
4:58 I don't like, like even on a really hot knife, you need a
5:01 sheet. Well, it's just like, you're so
5:03 exposed. I don't know.
5:05 Yeah. Like hiding under something.
5:06 Yeah. I do.
5:07 I like to pull something up and over me.
5:09 Yeah and yeah. Yeah, even if you've got the air
5:11 conditioned air conditioning blasting a little bit cooler
5:14 just so that you. Can have your sheet on 100%,
5:16 yeah. Agreed.
5:16 I agree with that. I'll spend the fortune on the
5:18 air conditioner being on just to be able to do that.
5:21 Worth it. Worth it.
5:25 But yeah, the thought of these, Oh my God, these cold days out
5:29 in the oh, I hate feeling cold. I hate it in the core.
5:32 It's like, oh, and I was outside at work yesterday and I'm like,
5:36 it's just happened. Like it's that crispness in the
5:38 middle of the day where you go, oh, because when I was a couple
5:42 of weeks ago, I think we're standing at footy training.
5:44 We were like, oh, here it comes. Here's the that evening crisp,
5:48 but during the day crisp. Oh God.
5:50 You know, that's a change in the season, although this weekend is
5:53 gonna be really nice. It's gonna be 23 and sunny both
5:55 days. Well, I'll take that, yeah.
5:58 Yeah, we've got Mother's Day coming up this weekend.
5:59 Yeah, so that's nice. Oh well, Mother's Day.
6:01 You mean footy? Yeah, footy.
6:04 Oh my God, two games of footy each.
6:05 Yeah. And you know, family
6:08 commitments, but that's, that's what it's all about.
6:10 Being mums, that's what you do. Yeah, I've gotta do the gotta do
6:14 the dog poop pick up for 40 this week on Sweeping Judy Judies.
6:19 Oh, it is so funny. So our club Rost, if you're at
6:22 home, you get rosted on, potentially get rosted on to do
6:25 the it's called a ground sweep, but it's literally just picking
6:27 up dog shit that's on the Oval, which I mean, it's a well
6:31 appreciated by everyone. Absolutely.
6:34 So who are these evil people who are not picking up their dog?
6:36 Total, total Dick heads. On the kids footy Oval.
6:39 Yuck. Yeah, it's just crazy.
6:40 Yuck, yuck, yuck, yuck. We don't generally have to do
6:43 that because I volunteer every week in a different capacity.
6:47 Anything else when you volunteer?
6:48 Peter's happy to do like umpire, what do you call it, Golden
6:52 umpiring or the umpire escort or things like that?
6:54 He's doesn't mind doing that. Yeah.
6:56 Or time keeper or whatever. Yeah, we tend to not have to
7:00 worry too much about the other jobs.
7:02 You're welcome, Peter. Oh.
7:03 Totally. I mean, I'm, I'm grateful 'cause
7:05 there's a couple that we know that have volunteered
7:07 permanently to the ground sweep for our team.
7:10 So they're on every week, but they're still like, they're like
7:13 the two of them are happy to do it together, like husband and
7:15 wife. And so we don't actually need
7:17 anyone else doing it. But I've been, I've been
7:19 rostered on to do it 'cause they're still getting a second
7:21 person on the roster. But I'm like, so they keep
7:23 telling me, oh, don't worry about it.
7:24 You have to do it. Like, we'll do it.
7:26 I'm like, oh, but I feel bad. Like if I don't at least show my
7:28 face, show up. I'll come, I'll come 10.
7:30 Minutes. They might try and make me do
7:31 something else, oh I don't know, canteen duty or something.
7:35 Oh, I I didn't mind doing the canteen.
7:38 Yeah, I haven't done canteen yet.
7:39 Actually, I haven't. No, I haven't given that job
7:41 yet. So yeah, I'm, I'm, I don't mind
7:43 helping out. But fine but.
7:45 Picking up dog shit. Oh.
7:46 Yeah. It's already hard enough on
7:48 Mother's Day to get there well. This is so this one of our, one
7:51 of my friends, Erin, she's got a couple of kids in Ollie's team
7:55 and the team manager put out a thing during the week saying,
7:58 hey, we actually just don't have anyone rostered to canteen for
8:02 first and second-half this week. Yeah, any volunteers And I see
8:06 Heron at BFT every morning. She's like one of the two of the
8:10 dads need to volunteer for that on Mother's Day.
8:12 There shouldn't be mums there. Shouldn't be mums doing it?
8:14 No, I'm like, why? Is it always the mums who do the
8:17 canteen and the dads that do the bands?
8:20 Go on hiring. Or whatever.
8:22 Yeah, Come on, guys. I think fingers are beyond the
8:24 gender stereotypes, peeps. Absolutely.
8:27 Yeah, yeah. Yeah, I think on Mother's Day
8:29 particularly, it should be the dads stepping up.
8:32 Yeah, for sure. But nobody's volunteered yet,
8:34 so. Are you serious?
8:35 Just no one, none of the dads have come into the group chat
8:37 and gone. Yeah, yeah.
8:38 Like, like. Not not.
8:40 So I'm just gonna wait for that to pan itself.
8:42 Out tells me. I thought we've moved past this.
8:44 Yeah, no, no, no. Anyway, I've got a few shout
8:48 outs for today. Yes.
8:49 So we've got Katrina Jenner and Nick who have been commenting, I
8:54 think they were Instagram. I think Instagram.
8:58 And I'd also like to shout out to an ex work colleague of mine,
9:02 actually her name is Dai, and I went away with her a few weeks
9:06 ago on that cruise. And she was just, she knew so
9:09 much about our episodes. Like, I can tell she was super
9:12 into it and loved listening. So thank you, Dai, and thank
9:15 you, Nick and Katrina. Yeah.
9:17 Yeah. That's awesome.
9:18 I love that. Yeah.
9:20 Do you find that people are coming up to you and saying
9:22 things like people in your real life and like, I didn't know you
9:24 listened? Definitely, definitely.
9:28 Yeah. I've got a particular work
9:30 colleague that I actually didn't realise.
9:31 I knew. She knew we were doing the
9:32 podcast and that's something. But she's actually really into
9:36 this and shout her out. Yeah.
9:38 So Mel, she knows she'll be listening, I'm sure.
9:41 And I'm. And she came to me going, I
9:42 didn't even know you're on socials and I've found you on
9:44 there. And I see her name pop up, you
9:45 know, with likes and stuff on things now.
9:47 And I'm like, no, Oh yeah, she's here and she knows she's into
9:49 it. She's she doesn't really talk
9:51 about it much at work, but I can sense that she's got some
9:53 interest and got some things to say.
9:55 It's. Mel.
9:56 We'll chat, Mel, we'll chat. Just corner Meg in her office
10:00 one day and. As they all do, she'll have.
10:03 No, no end of things to talk to you about.
10:07 Try and separate the two. But now I'm happy to chat.
10:10 Love it. Yeah, yeah.
10:11 Now, we talked about this in the last episode, but our 50th
10:15 episode is coming up very, very quickly.
10:17 Given this is given that this is episode 46, so we are putting it
10:22 out there to our listeners to give us suggestions of what you
10:25 would like us to cover for our 50th episode.
10:27 We want it to be a bit of a milestone.
10:29 Yeah, for us, we think like, you know, 50 episodes, that's
10:32 incredible. It's huge.
10:33 We're really proud of it and we want to sort of mark the
10:35 occasion with something special that everyone wants to hear and
10:38 have us research and listen to. So we're not sure whether we
10:41 want to go down like something a little bit lighter like a
10:43 celebrity type case or we're totally, 100% open to everyone's
10:48 suggestions. Yeah, send them on through your
10:51 and DM us through Instagram. You can contact us through
10:54 Spotify, through the platform there or Facebook.
10:58 Yeah, let us know. There's so many places to reach
11:01 out or even just shoot us an e-mail.
11:03 Yeah, to [email protected]. Please do.
11:06 Yeah, we're here for it. Oh.
11:08 Yeah, yeah. Love it.
11:09 No, love loving getting all the messages and it's and it's, it
11:12 is, it's growing and I'm I am struggling a little bit to keep
11:15 up with times, but I get there eventually.
11:16 If I haven't responded, just give me some time.
11:19 We get there, yeah, sometimes my days get busy during work and I
11:22 see them peeing through and I want to do it, but I've
11:24 obviously got other things I have to do the.
11:27 Responsibilities. It's all a bit.
11:28 Much so sometimes I might leave you on red, so I'm sorry I might
11:31 have time to read it but not reply.
11:33 Yep. Doing our best to keep.
11:35 Up. Oh yeah, Yep, Juggling at all.
11:36 But it's all good. We get there.
11:38 That's it, That's it. Thank you to everybody.
11:40 Absolutely. All right, shall we delve into
11:44 where we're at? So if you haven't listened to
11:45 last week's episode, please go back and do so because it gives
11:48 all of the background. And we're kind of at the point
11:52 now where we've got an investigation starting for Lynn.
11:57 Well and truly after June, she has gone missing.
12:01 So yeah, go back, listen to the to the first episode if you
12:05 haven't. Yeah, if you don't know this
12:06 case and you really need that back story, otherwise this is
12:08 none of this is probably gonna make sense.
12:10 No, that's. Exactly right.
12:11 That's it. So where are we starting for
12:15 this one? I think well, there was a little
12:16 bit of information we did forget to mention that.
12:18 I just really wanna throw in there today that we talked
12:20 discussed how so obviously Chris Dawson, his wife Lynn is missing
12:25 and has been he's divorced her and married this young JCI
12:29 believe she was 18 when they got married.
12:32 She turned 18. So it was legal.
12:34 But anyway. Morally questionable.
12:37 Ethically questionable. And as we, yeah, as we
12:39 discussed, he moved her in very quickly into the family home and
12:41 it moved very quickly in terms of them then getting married
12:43 like a couple within a couple of years of her disappearance, they
12:46 were married. But one thing we didn't mention
12:48 was the fact that when they did marry, the wedding rings that
12:52 they used were Lin's. They had resized them and
12:59 engagement and wedding. Now the thing, the fact of the
13:01 matter is that he had those in his possession even says
13:04 something to me because I know the the marriage was on the
13:07 rocks, but Lynn was very much trying to keep that marriage
13:09 together. Would you not think that if she
13:11 disappeared that she would not have been wearing them?
13:15 Yes, and her friends say that. And she wasn't one of these
13:18 people. You know how there are people
13:20 who take their rings on and off? Like they might take their rings
13:22 off to wash the dishes or something?
13:24 I've never been that person. And some people, like, honestly,
13:27 like, they have jobs or whatever, for whatever reason
13:28 that they don't wear their rings.
13:29 Yeah, but Lynn was not that person.
13:31 Nope. You know, she wore her rings all
13:33 of the time, so even the fact that he had her rings.
13:36 Yeah. Possession is suspect, yeah.
13:38 And then come on, resize them and give them to you a little.
13:41 It's disgusting. Oh so disrespectful, even
13:45 disrespectful to JC as well as I mean, the fact of the matter is,
13:49 you know, your second marriage, you know, all that sort of
13:51 stuff. You know, in, in the context of
13:53 just literally like, yes, your wife has disappeared and you're
13:55 remarrying or something. Yep, you're entitled to remarry
13:58 and entitled to move on in your life and but you would not use
14:01 your ex wife's rings to marry that person.
14:04 I went to uni with a girl who was proposed to with a ring that
14:09 her fiance had bought a previous girlfriend and proposed to her
14:14 with and he and she said no a. 100%.
14:18 And I was like no no no, as in my friend at uni.
14:22 Said yes. Oh, she said.
14:23 Yes. She then later found out it was
14:25 the same ring that he'd proposed to another woman with.
14:28 I would have said no, you need to go and get new rings.
14:32 Oh my God, yes, oh God. And also, girls, if you get
14:37 proposed to take the ring, they can't take it back.
14:40 Do something with it. Mine is sitting there.
14:44 I need to do something with it because The thing is like I'm
14:46 not that you want to say this one jinxed, but like you know,
14:50 they're they're being part of a marriage and had their lives to
14:54 me like it's. Imagine like you like you would
14:58 think an engagement rings a very personal thing, the fact that
15:04 it's been reused. At least melt it down and reset
15:08 the diamonds whereas they just resized them.
15:12 Sure. Even that even the big question.
15:14 Even that is true. Yeah, you.
15:16 Think for their daughters, that's a legacy.
15:18 Yeah, Item, Yeah, which she. Now will never.
15:20 Have no especially in that situation where mum disappeared.
15:24 There was something happened to mum not as in like oh you guys
15:28 had massive Blues and you just separated like you know and that
15:31 there's I'll toward to each other.
15:33 Well there's award. But like you know well to the
15:36 NTH degree like like where it's got real real bad.
15:39 But yeah, in their in their minds of if Chris Dawson wants
15:42 to stay this, you know, course of, you know, oh, she just
15:44 walked out and like, and this maybe says something happened to
15:46 her that we don't know about. Like, you know, that that's sad
15:50 for the girls. They should have something to
15:52 remember her by. And no, he resized them and gave
15:58 them to his new, much younger wife because she was.
16:02 Also didn't she wouldn't have known any better like she
16:05 wouldn't have she probably felt in fact I know she would have
16:08 felt like she couldn't say I'm not using Lynns rings.
16:12 Like that, no, she was not in a position to be able to have any
16:14 opinion. So he's just dictated that yet
16:17 again and controlled that situation.
16:19 Yeah, for what it was, yeah. I really wanted to get that out
16:22 there. Of what?
16:23 Happened there. That's an important point.
16:24 I think that shows a lot about. Who?
16:27 Relationship, who he was, the situation at the time and how JC
16:31 just she had no choice but to go along for the ride.
16:33 Yeah, yeah. So.
16:36 We left off I think at about 1990 where they had divorced and
16:40 we're at a point of where they've been an inquest of into
16:43 the investigation into the disappearance of Lynn, which
16:47 nothing much really came of that, No.
16:49 So we're basically now in yeah, 1990s where we've got Lynn still
16:54 missing. No, no real investigation, full
16:58 investigation that has occurred. Yeah, that's exactly right.
17:01 Nothing, Nothing has been really done, No.
17:04 And it was decades before things were actually really started to
17:09 be investigated properly. Yes.
17:11 So I think contextually we can give a little bit around this as
17:15 well. So we spoke about this obviously
17:18 in the first episode and this is something that everyone thinks
17:22 of when they think of Lynette Dawson and that is The Teacher's
17:25 Pet podcast. So in the podcast that came out
17:29 in 2018, things had started happening in the lead up to
17:34 that. So I think Headley Thomas, the
17:38 lead investigative journalist who produced The Teacher's Pet
17:43 through his role at The Australian newspaper, he
17:47 basically what he instigated a lot of things even prior to the
17:52 podcast being released. So him looking into Lynette's
17:56 disappearance, interviewing people who knew her, it really
17:59 made people then go, yeah, you're right.
18:01 This has actually been playing on my mind for decades now and I
18:06 do need to do something about it.
18:07 So it actually sparked a reinvestigation of well, you
18:11 know what, it actually sparked an investigation of the case.
18:15 Yeah. So the teacher's pet came out
18:18 and in 2018 and it very strongly suggested that Chris Dawson was
18:23 was responsible for the murder of of Lynette Dawson.
18:27 But obviously they didn't have a lot of proof at the time.
18:31 And the NSW Police, you know, it was incumbent upon them then to
18:38 really investigate this properly and, and put in a proper
18:42 coronial inquest and see where, where all of that information
18:45 actually led and what they were going to do about it.
18:48 So it's, it was an. It was an interesting time, I
18:52 suppose. Yeah, I guess coming on to this
18:56 case, like obviously as we're saying, the police had not done
18:59 a lot until there was a particular person that came into
19:03 this case was was handed to Damian Loon, who we've probably
19:06 mentioned in other cases. I feel like probably.
19:09 Yeah, he's really well known and he he was handed this as a cold
19:12 case. And I've actually heard him
19:15 speak about this a number of different podcasts and he talked
19:19 about the fact that this this case intrigued him massively.
19:24 He didn't have a really a budget on looking into it.
19:26 It was just basically one of his cold cases he was handed, but he
19:29 didn't stay in that particular area for very long in terms of
19:35 what that that was a role he was he was in when he was then moved
19:39 to a different area of the police.
19:41 He asked, but can I stay on this one?
19:44 It really it was it was a bugbear for him that this hadn't
19:47 been, you know, investigated. Yeah, it was.
19:50 Handed to him to Detective Damian Loon in 1998.
19:55 There had been, According to him at the time, there had been
19:58 basically no records. There was like.
20:00 One piece of paper in the box, because Hedley Thomas was the
20:02 same when he sort of walked into this.
20:04 It was not a lot because he actually Hedley Thomas actually
20:08 looked at this well before 2018. Well, so it was actually he
20:12 looked at it in the 90s and was like, this is an interest.
20:14 I know of this case because he actually went to Cromer High.
20:17 Yeah. So he was he.
20:18 Knew of this area yeah. And he knew of this, the vibe of
20:21 the the whole place, yeah, that sort of thing.
20:24 So when he. First entered into this and gone
20:27 what what's been investigated this the two of Damian loom and
20:30 him had already got to know each other a little bit and they he
20:33 was like there's not much to like in this.
20:34 There's been no people, you know, interviewed etcetera.
20:37 And he's the one piece of paper in the box, which was, you know,
20:41 some very vague information around who was involved in JC
20:45 and who she was and all those sorts of things, but but not
20:47 enough to go. There's a pia.
20:50 So at the time, Hayley Thomas was like, oh, I'm intrigued
20:52 because there is definitely more to this.
20:54 And there was nothing to say. There was more, but no further
20:57 investigation. So it wasn't until he then later
21:00 on came back to it. He was like, it was always in
21:02 the back of his head. I wanna do more on this.
21:04 But I think he got caught into, I think life, you know, took on
21:07 for him, young kids. That was time.
21:08 Yeah. Yeah.
21:09 So he didn't. It wasn't time for him to take
21:11 this on and Damian Loon was a bit the the same in that he was,
21:14 as I say, he wasn't actually then even in the role of cold
21:17 cases, he was doing other work within the the police force.
21:20 But this stayed his case. And every now and then if he'd
21:23 get a moment, he'd do a bit on it or something had come to him.
21:26 You know, someone had bring something to him and say this
21:28 has come up. That's to do with that case.
21:30 And he started to gather things. So it was all very slow paced in
21:34 the background it. Was so slow paced that nothing
21:36 really happened until 1999. Yeah, so 19992000.
21:41 Yes, he was. I believe Damian was working on
21:44 this in his spare time. Now, what police officer or
21:46 detective has spare time? Probably not many of them.
21:48 So it did take a long time, but he had a gut feeling about it.
21:52 Yeah, so much so. So they ended up conducting a
21:58 small excavation at the Bayview house.
21:59 So they lived, you know, the house was in Bayview.
22:02 We talked about the house in the previous episode.
22:04 They built it. It was down the road from
22:07 Paul's, sorry, Chris''s twin brother Paul.
22:10 They did a small excavation at the time, focusing on the pool
22:14 and surrounds. This was based on information
22:16 that had been given to them by the neighbor.
22:18 Again, we spoke about her in the last episode because.
22:20 Paul had had some works on it. Had some works done and for not
22:25 really, they didn't really know what was happening.
22:27 They had some paving replaced and nobody really, like, knew
22:31 why and what was going on. Yeah.
22:32 And they used like a ground penetrating radar at the time.
22:35 And they could see that there'd been a disturbance in soil in
22:38 that area. So that was enough to get a
22:40 subpoena to be able to, to, to actually perform an excavation.
22:46 Yeah. At this time, they found a pink
22:48 cardigan and everyone got really, really excited because
22:51 pink was Lin's favorite colour. In fact, at all of the court
22:55 cases that you can see with Lynn's family, they all wear
22:58 pink ribbons to, you know, in remembrance of her.
23:01 So everyone got really, really excited about this pink cardigan
23:05 and unfortunately it went for forensic testing, it came back
23:10 and nothing could be taken from it.
23:12 So they actually. Was found to have like, like
23:15 ribs in it Like oh, it was potentially like.
23:17 But it was not completely ripped.
23:19 Yeah, it was completely ripped. But there was talk that that
23:21 could have been, they could sort of say that it would had been
23:23 you like a knife had been used and things like maybe.
23:26 Yeah, I'm, I'm not sure of that. Yeah, it's, it's 100%.
23:30 It was ripped, at least ripped in half, if not yet.
23:32 I mean, quite possibly, but forensically they couldn't get
23:35 anything of it. They don't even know if it was
23:37 Lin's at the end of the day. If that was tested again in like
23:41 between not 2020 to 25, do you think they'd be potentially more
23:46 able to be found of it or I don't?
23:47 Know because it was buried and it was wet like it was there was
23:51 a lot of moisture it was around a pool there was scary there was
23:54 a lot there I I don't know but thankfully we.
23:59 Don't know. No, no.
24:01 So yeah, there was that obviously sparked more interest
24:05 this cardigan. It really gave the case and a
24:07 bit of a push, even though the actual cardigan ended up not
24:10 really going anywhere. No, it would have been awesome
24:12 even if they could just find even a picture of Lynn wearing
24:16 that cardigan, to be honest. But and and I.
24:18 Think no one had ever seen a inner cardigan?
24:21 Like, yeah, whatever. In February of 2001, the first
24:25 of two perennial inquests took place and this was initiated by
24:30 the NSW Police. But you know, it was still the,
24:34 the results of the NSW Police at the time was still inconclusive.
24:38 They, it's not like they were like, Yep, we've got hard
24:40 evidence to say this is what's happened.
24:43 Deputy State Coroner Jan Stevenson determined that Lynn
24:47 was most likely murdered by a known person and the DPP, the
24:51 director of public prosecutions at the time, didn't lay any
24:54 charges because they said there was insufficient evidence and.
24:57 Yeah, See, that really was a huge bugbear for Damian Loan
25:00 because so he went to them and because typically he said in
25:03 these sorts of incidents where they would say that he could
25:06 approach them and say what's missing, what do I need to get?
25:09 What do I need to do to make this go over the line to say
25:11 that you will. They said to him, we can't, we
25:14 can't do that. We can't tell you.
25:17 Why? Yeah, To this day, he doesn't
25:18 know. They were very secretive.
25:21 Basically, it's confidential. We can't, we can't speak to
25:23 that. Wow In February of 2003, a
25:28 second coronial inquest began with deputy State coroner Carl
25:32 Milovanovic recommending that the DPP lay charges for murder
25:36 by a known person. So by this stage there was
25:39 obviously enough to have another coronial inquest take place.
25:42 There'd been enough investigations in this time.
25:45 So we've, you know, we've had enough of a development.
25:49 Again, the DPP refused to lay any charges, again stating that
25:55 there was insufficient evidence to support a criminal charge
25:58 against any person. So the fact that in the second
26:02 coronial inquest they've said it is now by person.
26:05 Known. Is a big deal the police then?
26:11 So Damian Loon and his team then, I think they knew what
26:15 they were focusing on all along, but in keeping an open mind as
26:18 well, they were investigating all possibilities. 12 years this
26:23 went on, yeah, 12 years. And it wasn't until 2015 where
26:30 the NSW Police Force formed an on an unsolved homicide unit.
26:35 But that was a bit of a tongue for stuff which was led by
26:39 Detective Damian Poole and he actually rate formally reopened
26:43 the investigation into Lynn's disappearance.
26:46 So over the next three years, the incident was under
26:52 investigation by this new unsolved homicide unsolved
26:58 homicide squad. And they they put together a
27:02 brief of evidence that they then wanted the DPP to review.
27:06 And because they thought at that time they had enough
27:09 circumstantial evidence to at least bring a trial, bring it to
27:13 trial and bring a charge. Whoops, sorry.
27:15 So charges. Trial bring a charge against
27:18 Chris. Yeah.
27:19 But again, it LED nowhere. Yeah.
27:22 In September of 2018. So going back in 2000, in the
27:27 year 2000, they did that first excavation of just around the
27:30 pool. Yeah, in 2018.
27:33 So 18 years later, the Dawson's former Bayview property was
27:37 mapped, searched and excavated and no further evidence was
27:41 uncovered. That search was done like the
27:45 the teacher's pet had been launched and it was so Headley
27:49 was already doing a massive amount of research himself
27:52 alongside what was going on with the police that obviously it
27:56 sparked such huge community interest that there was bigger
28:01 push to do more. So obviously then, yeah.
28:03 And other excavations occurred. It's disappointing nothing was
28:06 found, but I don't know. I'm not not, I'm not surprised
28:11 either because to me so much time has gone on.
28:13 And he'd moved in that house. And they'd moved from that what
28:16 year they moved they. Must have moved it was it was
28:18 after 2000. Was it?
28:20 I thought it was even earlier than that I.
28:21 Don't. I'm pretty sure when the.
28:23 Oh actually no, I think I feel right.
28:24 Sorry. Even when the first excavation
28:26 took place, they didn't. Know, no, I feel like they did
28:28 move to like Queensland as he originally planned with her.
28:31 I feel like they did move, which, you know, yeah.
28:34 I mean, I think I think he's not an idiot.
28:36 Like I really honestly think that he whatever did with her
28:40 when she died and potentially that was somewhere near the
28:43 pool, but I think before they moved or whatever, I reckon him
28:46 and his brother would have moved the body.
28:48 Oh, 100%, yeah. So the Teachers Pet podcast
28:51 actually started in the May of that year.
28:53 So the first episode was released in the May, and it
28:56 wasn't until the September that that excavation took place.
28:59 And you're absolutely right. It was due to public outcry
29:03 because people, you know, even when it was first launched, it
29:06 was so wildly popular, the podcast and people really got
29:09 onto it. And when you launch a podcast
29:12 like that, you get your armchair detectives.
29:14 There were people independently investigating this for
29:19 themselves and coming up with their own theories and.
29:21 But also more people were going, hey, I actually remember this
29:25 and I've got information to share too.
29:26 And this is where, like, the neighbor comes into play.
29:29 You know, she's the one who was like, oh, yeah, well, these are
29:33 the things that I remember. Yes.
29:35 You know, that says a lot. But this was, I mean, how many
29:38 years? Almost 40 years after the fact?
29:40 Yeah. Was it 30 something years?
29:42 Like, it's absolutely ridiculous.
29:44 Crazy Oh. You're right, though.
29:48 It meant more and more witnesses came forward to the police and
29:52 also to Headley. Like, he interviewed a lot of
29:54 people who hadn't gone to the police yet.
29:56 To his credit, he handed over everything when the
29:59 investigations were taking place.
30:01 All of his raw tapes, unedited everything.
30:04 Yeah, all of his information. Apparently it was like boxes and
30:07 boxes and boxes. A lot more than that one piece
30:09 of paper that was there when he first looked into it.
30:11 That's. Exactly right, so hats off to
30:14 him. Absolutely.
30:15 He might this none of this ever would have come to the floor.
30:19 So in December of was it December?
30:23 Yes, December 5/2. 1018 Chris Dawson was arrested with
30:29 attempted murder charges and no sorry with a murder charge and
30:34 at that time was he charged for the carnal knowledge.
30:39 No, that came later. Okay, yeah.
30:40 So at this stage he's just been charged with Lynns murder, yes
30:44 Yeah. He submitted 2 bail
30:46 applications. The first was rejected, the
30:48 second was granted with a surety of one and a half million
30:52 Australian dollars. Committal proceedings then
30:57 followed in Feb of 2020. Like right before the pandemic,
31:01 Yeah. I think for us, our world
31:03 shutdown in March of that year was yeah.
31:05 So, you know, he just made it, just made it through.
31:08 Just made it. He was committed to stand trial
31:11 in that committal proceeding because he pled not guilty to
31:15 the charge of Lynn's murder. So at that time they set a trial
31:21 date for much later in that year, not knowing what was
31:24 coming. Yeah.
31:26 I mean, you get it kind of there because there's been quite a gap
31:28 between then and the trial actually occurring.
31:31 But I mean, this is the sort of trial you couldn't have held it
31:33 during lockdown. No, it wasn't 1.
31:36 You could just do online. Like to me, like, that was
31:39 definitely something that had to be done in court.
31:41 In person, it was too. Big it was, too.
31:44 Important. Way too important.
31:45 There were so many witnesses that needed to be called and I
31:47 think because the case was still circumstantial.
31:50 Yeah, it was, it was. I mean, it's all circumstantial
31:52 evidence that they have because they don't have a body.
31:55 That's right. Yeah, I think, I think that's
31:59 that did a service to Lynn's case.
32:02 The fact that it was held in person, because you could see
32:05 people's emotions, you could see the reaction of all of the
32:09 witnesses and everything that kind of goes along with that.
32:13 Absolutely. Yeah, yeah.
32:14 You needed to hear directly from people and see them in the
32:16 court. To me, like, yeah, yeah.
32:18 Definitely Chris's defence. So his brother Peter Dawson was
32:24 a lawyer? Oh my God.
32:26 I really am intrigued by that. I don't know.
32:29 I just don't think that it's ethical.
32:31 Oh, yeah. I don't think it's ethical that
32:33 your brother represents you. I know that there was a
32:35 barrister who was actually there on the day in the court
32:38 proceedings who, you know, spoke and was ahead of it, but
32:41 obviously he's sitting next to that person and, you know,
32:42 directing etcetera. So, but I still just don't know
32:47 that it's ethical that your brother is your legal
32:49 representative. But at the same time, what the
32:53 hell? How can the circumstantial
32:56 evidence is huge on this Oh. Absolutely.
32:58 As a family, I know you stand by and this is where I kind of got,
33:01 I don't think it should be a brother being illegal
33:03 representative because OK, there's you're wanting to stand
33:05 by your brother and you know, and be like supportive in this
33:08 situation, whether they've murdered someone or not.
33:11 You, you know, as family, you rally, but you rally at the same
33:14 time as also being you can love your brother and also know that
33:18 he's done wrong. And I think that that would be
33:21 an awful position to be in. But this family, this family
33:24 would never like that. No.
33:25 They always condoned his shit behaviour.
33:28 Yeah, they knew that he was having an affair with a
33:30 teenager, yes. And he helped him hide it.
33:33 They helped him commit to me knowledge like.
33:37 His brother has, I mean, whether you know, this brother in
33:40 particular, I don't know whether he was participating in those
33:42 activities or what have you, but probably, but there's not
33:46 enough, there's not evidence of that.
33:48 But like you're too close and because so you have knowledge of
33:52 of him and what went on back then.
33:55 I mean, he legit came to him and said, well, how do I have my 16
33:59 year old child, you know, like bride that I wanna be with and
34:04 not lose my money linked up with, with Lynn?
34:06 I mean, to then have him as your legal counsel.
34:09 I just don't think that that's right.
34:11 No, although I I think about that from the context of if it
34:16 was my brother and I was a lawyer and I felt like I had the
34:20 ability I'd. I would, no, I would still be
34:23 like, I will give you, I'll tell you who to go to and who I trust
34:25 to do it for you, but I'd have to sit.
34:28 Out. Help yourself.
34:28 I don't know. I don't know.
34:30 But then. But then I think you're right in
34:33 that if I'd known that a sibling of mine had done something
34:39 wrong, you couldn't then ethically represent them because
34:43 you know they've done something. This is it.
34:46 You're you're actually lying in court.
34:48 Yeah. Because.
34:49 So you're in. Yeah.
34:50 You're in contempt and you're perjuring.
34:51 Yeah. Because he knows.
34:53 He knows, especially the next trial, he knows that that he
34:57 knows what went on there. Oh, so it's.
35:00 I just think I find it really. Yeah.
35:02 Wrong. Prior to this first trial,
35:05 though, Chris's representation, his barrister put it to the
35:09 court that the podcast eroded his fundamental right to the
35:12 presumption of presumption of innocent and innocence and his
35:16 right to stay silent. Yeah.
35:18 And so that there was actually court proceedings in relation to
35:25 the teachers podcast, what that meant for Chris in terms of
35:29 getting a fair trial. Yeah.
35:31 And how the court were were going to handle that.
35:33 So to Headley's credit, they removed all podcasts from his
35:39 podcast from broadcast at that time.
35:41 In Australia, In Australia. So, yeah, internationally you
35:44 could still listen this to it entirely.
35:46 Yeah, which I mean, yeah, you didn't need to pull it from
35:48 there because they weren't going to be jurors in this trial,
35:50 whereas someone in Australia is. I fully get that.
35:52 Yeah, absolutely. Yeah.
35:54 And yeah, would that they. So Headley also turned over, as
36:00 I said, all of his research and everything that went with it,
36:03 which took. He then became.
36:05 Detectives. A long time to go through, but
36:07 yeah. He became a witness then that's
36:09 right in the trial, which I would have been really
36:11 frustrating for him like in the in the sense of he's done all
36:14 this hard work. He is, you know, as there was no
36:17 invested in getting Chris Dawson on this 100 like as anyone
36:22 really as equally I would say to as to a family at that point.
36:25 He was with them, you know, he was on their team.
36:27 Oh. He wore the pink ribbons.
36:28 Yeah, absolutely. But he couldn't then be, he
36:32 couldn't hear other people's testimony, all those sorts of
36:34 things. He couldn't actually see the
36:36 court hearing as it would play out.
36:38 Yeah, because he was a witness. You then have to be isolated
36:41 between because you can't hear someone else's testimony and
36:43 then sit, then have and do yours because it might be influenced
36:46 by it. So he was completely removed
36:48 until his testimony. He had been completely done
36:50 before. He could then watch any part of
36:52 the trial and be a part of it. So that would have been really
36:55 hard for him. But at the same time, he
36:59 achieved what he went and set out to do at the same time, so.
37:02 Yeah, he talks about that in the podcast about his experience
37:08 being in the witness box. And it's not the first, it's not
37:10 the last time that that happened with his further investigations
37:13 like he's done many. Other cases, yeah.
37:15 Podcast cases after. He was in the trial box for like
37:18 2 days I think. Yeah, yeah.
37:20 And he talks about how exhausting it is and, you know,
37:24 it's hard to keep in line all of the things, you know, he said he
37:27 did thousands of hours of research and to try and report
37:30 things that were posed to him. Yeah.
37:33 Was really drain. Well, it's.
37:35 Draining because you want to make sure you get what you want
37:38 to said, but you've got to rely on other people's questions to
37:41 do that. So you can't jump ahead and like
37:43 say things without it being a question to you.
37:45 But like at the same time, like the courts don't play out how
37:49 you think they do in movies and stuff Being in the court,
37:52 there's lots of pauses, lots of like lawyers don't always
37:55 succinctly ask their questions and they'll rummage through
37:58 papers and like there's lots of pauses and lots of drain dragged
38:01 out bits. Wait as a witness, he'd be
38:03 sitting there going, what's going to be the next question?
38:08 What am I going to do? And just wait for the lawyer to
38:10 come and bring that question to you, whether that's both the
38:13 prosecution and the defence. So it's a long, it'll be a long
38:17 bloody day sitting there of questions and then being and
38:20 then being asked questions within like going, Nope,
38:21 restrict that from the record. We can't ask that.
38:23 And like gotta go back again and try again and try and get it out
38:26 of them another way. It would be exhausting.
38:29 Yeah, absolutely exhausting. For all of the witnesses, yeah,
38:31 Lynn's you know Members of Lynn's family testified they
38:35 submitted. So the prosecution submitted
38:38 Helenae diary as part of the evidence because so Helena was
38:42 Lynns mum. What did she pass away?
38:44 Do you remember? It was well before all.
38:46 This, it was well before all, yeah, But she kept an incredibly
38:51 detailed diary. She wrote verbatim certain
38:55 conversations that she'd had and all of that.
38:57 Well done to her to do that. I mean, that was just her.
39:00 Yeah, that's it's not even. She didn't even do it because of
39:02 suspicion. No, no, no.
39:03 Anything that's in like diary and journaling like that was a
39:07 bigger thing I think than it is today.
39:08 I'd love to go back. I remember when I was a kid, I
39:11 used to say and all, yeah, I'd love to go back and read.
39:14 Them No, I don't think I've got. I would cringe something
39:16 shocking. I think I know where I think
39:19 I've got all mine, actually. It'd be so interesting to go
39:22 back and read them. It'd be gross.
39:26 Oh. Jesus, Mum's just been horrible
39:28 to me all day. My brother's shit.
39:32 My brother's awful. Oh God, sounds like today.
39:38 Yeah, actually, What? Sorry.
39:39 What? What's changed?
39:41 Yeah, yeah, a lot. Not a lot.
39:43 Just that much. I don't like not hate my mum
39:45 anymore. I know I appreciate her if
39:47 you're. A teenagehood you're like, Oh
39:49 yeah. Oh crap, I was awful.
39:52 God, it's a right of happy. Absolutely.
39:55 In September of 2020, Supreme Court Justice Fullerton rejected
39:59 Dawson's application for a permanent stain proceedings,
40:01 which he'd said based on the podcast and the fact that he was
40:05 never going to get a fair trial. Yeah, that was that was
40:11 rejected. He then the judge actually did
40:14 grant him a temporary state of proceedings for nine months to
40:17 relieve the concerns of fairness sparked by the podcast.
40:20 So I think this was nine months where the podcast wasn't going
40:23 to be available in Australia. Yeah, they could, you know, find
40:26 enough, potentially find enough jurors who hadn't engaged in the
40:29 content etcetera, etcetera. He appealed that, of course,
40:34 because that's just what the proceeds they do.
40:36 Yeah, but the trial was rescheduled then to commit.
40:39 So he appealed like to the High Court.
40:40 Like, yeah, you kept going. All of the appeal processes,
40:43 they all said no, fuck off, you've actually got to face
40:46 this. Yeah.
40:47 So the trial was then rescheduled to commence on the
40:49 9th of May in 2022. Yeah.
40:53 So he made in just before that he actually made an application
40:58 for his trial to be heard by a judge only.
41:00 So a judge alone trial. Which I think was, I mean, I
41:04 mean, I think it was a good move, to be honest, in that
41:07 respect. I do agree that due to the
41:10 podcast, potentially he would have struggled to find a jury
41:13 that we're going to be impartial entirely.
41:17 So I think that that was, you know, but that's an option
41:19 available to anybody to do that. So yeah.
41:22 In Australia, though, when an indictable criminal offence
41:25 proceeds to trial, evidence is generally presented to a judge
41:29 and 12 jurors you know randomly selected from the.
41:32 Very rare that we have a judge only.
41:33 Trial here in Australia, I think in Australia it's a very, very
41:36 yeah. But I completely and in fact, I
41:39 think this is like someone of the cases that goes to teachings
41:43 for students like law students because it is not that common
41:47 here. Yeah.
41:48 And for reasons that, you know, for the first time ever, a
41:51 podcast had it actually caused that to happen.
41:54 Yeah. And I don't think it'll be the
41:55 last. I really don't and.
41:56 Then you've got you think about all of the media coverage for
41:59 many cases and what influenced this case in case a precedent
42:04 has would give to future cases in terms of any media coverage.
42:09 It's it's really fascinating. Yeah.
42:12 Dawson's trial was heard by Justice Ian Harrison, who?
42:16 Oh my God, you can listen to his full verdict.
42:19 It's like friggin 40 pages. Yeah, it's really like hours.
42:24 He took hours to read it until it's caught.
42:26 Yeah. Yeah, it's a lot.
42:29 He's a lovely man, a really kind, empathetic, very fair,
42:35 very just his. His finding had to be.
42:42 Like watertight? Absolutely.
42:44 Otherwise he was going to be criticized endlessly of like
42:46 being himself, being influenced by the podcast.
42:49 So I think even though he did stayed at the start, he had
42:52 never listened to the podcast. He didn't even know what
42:55 podcasts were. Loving.
43:00 Yeah. So, yeah, on the 31st of August
43:05 2022, he pronounced that the verdict was that Dawson was
43:12 guilty of murdering his wife Lynette on or soon after the 8th
43:16 of January in 1982. Yeah.
43:19 Now, is it worth having a chat about what we think actually
43:22 happened? Because it hasn't really.
43:24 I mean, there's theories everywhere.
43:26 Yeah, because there's no actual hard evidence there.
43:29 He hasn't. We don't really know what
43:32 actually happened, But I have a theory about what.
43:34 Happened. Do you?
43:35 I do, I do. I'd love to hear yours.
43:37 OK, yeah. So I think when Chris made Lynn
43:41 that nice drink that night, he has laced something in there
43:44 that has caused her to pass out or even potentially that could
43:49 have killed her. I don't know.
43:51 He's then perpetrated a murder against her.
43:53 He's hidden her body overnight and then gone to the pool the
43:58 next morning with the girls. Whether or not that night he's
44:02 done anything, I don't think so. I think Lynn's body stayed at
44:05 the house or somewhere near the house that the on the the night
44:09 before. I think he this and this is
44:11 awful in that where was JC at this point?
44:14 Where is she living at that point?
44:15 We don't know she. Wasn't at that.
44:16 No, she wasn't at the house. So I, I mean, because he, he,
44:20 his brother gives an alibi of him being at his place.
44:23 I honestly think whatever's happened with Lynn has happened
44:26 and he's I've like he's left those two young girls asleep.
44:28 See, I reckon. And he's gone to his night, you
44:31 reckon? Yeah, because Helena took the 2
44:33 girls home from the pool and they stayed that night with her
44:37 at Chris's insistence. Yeah.
44:39 So I think he's hidden. You know, I don't think he's
44:42 moved the body that night, I think, but I think he's gone,
44:44 he's done that, gone running to his brother, right?
44:47 And I reckon he was at Paul's house that night, but Lynn was
44:50 not alive back at her place. I think she's, he's confessed to
44:53 Paul what he's done, Right. And then that's where the two of
44:56 them have come up with this plan.
44:57 We'll sort this out. Just leave it where like she's
45:00 right where she is right now. You know, like tomorrow we're
45:02 going to plant this seed with people and that she's going to
45:04 disappear, like, you know, and then we'll sort it out from
45:07 there. I reckon that's sort of that
45:10 part of the evening played out. And then they've moved her body
45:12 the next day, I think. Yeah, that next night when the
45:15 girls went there and stuff, Paul and him have then done whatever.
45:18 Yeah, yeah. Yeah.
45:20 I mean, this is just what we think.
45:21 Yeah, never been necessarily. Proven.
45:23 I really think what what has happened is that he has he in
45:26 his mind has realized that JC is pulling away.
45:30 He's got to bring her in more to be able to keep her.
45:34 So he needs to get Lynn out. And I think that, yeah, he's
45:37 given her. He's like in that evening, he's
45:38 like, what am I gonna like it's built up to some sort of like
45:41 he's had the marriage counseling session and like, this is I'm
45:44 not fucking doing this. Like, you know, I need to get
45:47 her out of here and well. You know what, the counselor
45:49 probably saw something in him that he didn't like being
45:52 reflected back at him. You know, so he was like, I'm
45:54 not fucking doing that again. I'm not, I'm not being told that
45:57 I've done something wrong. I'm not taking accountability
46:00 here. But I shouldn't hit my wife and
46:02 I shouldn't be, you know, off fucking a 16 year.
46:05 Old. Yeah, you know, yeah, it's, I
46:07 reckon that that counselling session was quite possibly quite
46:09 surface anyway being a first session.
46:12 But at this, but even at that, he would have rejected doing any
46:14 more of that. So I think that it's all
46:17 escalated for him that day of his frustration of I'm not
46:19 getting what I want. So do you think he, like it was
46:22 premeditated at that point? Because the day that, you know,
46:25 we think she was murdered, they did have that counselling
46:29 session. She I Lynn spoke to her
46:32 colleagues saying they were holding hands and.
46:34 Yeah, see, I, I have a theory here.
46:37 So this is my theory that Lynn, in her mindset, things are
46:42 moving where she wants them to, right?
46:43 They're going to have their marriage back on track.
46:45 He's given her that drink. And I think that Lynn going, I'm
46:50 going to make sure this marriage stays on track.
46:52 We're doing so well. I think she's made advances
46:55 like, you know, let's have some, some special time and like
46:59 literally cement this fact that we're going going back on track.
47:03 He wants a young flirty thing. I'm I'm had a few drinks.
47:05 So I'm going to I'm loose here. And I think he has gone Oh fuck
47:09 no, this wasn't my plan. And then he's and I think that's
47:13 become a push and shove in it. It's gone from there.
47:17 That's what that's what I think would have played out in that
47:20 scenario of her thinking one way of where this is heading and
47:23 he's entirely actually going the opposite direction that that has
47:27 then imploded on them and that that.
47:29 Even escalated that night. Yeah.
47:31 Yeah. Do you think he'd planned to do
47:34 it? No, I don't think planned as in
47:35 like. Yeah, that night I'm gonna kill.
47:37 Her, I'm gonna kill her. I think that it's that it's
47:40 eventuated to a point of like, fuck, she wants this.
47:43 She thinks this is this marriage is gonna get fixed and I don't
47:47 want her attention. And maybe he's got physical with
47:49 her and that that that physical rejection has.
47:52 And she's maybe fired back at him of like, how dare you?
47:55 I thought we were fixing this, you know, like, and with her
47:58 being a bit intoxicated and all those sorts of things that he's
48:01 created. Yeah.
48:03 I think it's all just blown up from there.
48:04 And then he's taken it. That whole next step.
48:07 Yeah. And it's unfortunately ended up
48:09 where it did. So it's still intent in terms
48:11 of, oh, absolutely what he's done.
48:13 But not premeditated. Yeah.
48:14 Hours, days prior. Yeah.
48:17 Yeah. I do think it's certainly not
48:19 defence or anything like that to be called into it.
48:21 I don't think, you know. Yeah.
48:23 Because he's certainly a lot stronger than her, that's for
48:24 sure. Oh yeah.
48:25 I mean, she was. She wasn't a big lady.
48:28 No, but I mean, the girls were young, they wouldn't know what
48:30 was going on. So yeah.
48:31 And I do, I agree with you that they've he's then put the body
48:35 somewhere at that point, but nowhere necessarily permanently
48:39 and gone straight to his brother.
48:41 Oh, I've just killed her. Fuck, she's dead.
48:43 Like you know, and he's done that.
48:44 We'll sort this out. What kind of?
48:46 Ask good. Culpability.
48:48 What kind of culpability does the sister-in-law have too?
48:51 Because. I bet she knows.
48:53 Everything. I feel like she knows
48:54 everything, yeah. Because yeah, I just don't see
48:59 how she couldn't. And how did even if she didn't
49:02 know, she knew? She knew enough.
49:06 What was going on? She knew enough, she knew
49:08 intimately enough what was going on between Chris and Joanne
49:13 because fucking hell, they'd been housing Joanne.
49:17 See. Where's the fucking sisterhood?
49:18 Many, but yeah. Where exactly and why are we
49:21 protecting these toxic men? Mm hmm.
49:25 No. Because I mean, I dare say that
49:28 she was in a very similar situational in, I dare say Paul
49:31 would be physical with her potentially, you know, and and
49:34 abusive. I don't know.
49:36 There's nothing out there to say that, but he was absolutely, we
49:39 know now he was absolute. What's come out we now women,
49:44 but who were young girls at the time, have come out to say that
49:48 Paul was absolutely having. Multiple.
49:51 Multiple inappropriate relationships with young girls
49:58 as well Chris is. Somewhat only redeeming feature
50:01 in this is that he's stuck with one.
50:02 Like you know, like there's not evidence of him doing this to
50:05 multiple girls I guess. Whereas Paul in his scenario, he
50:09 was like he was jumping from girl to girl.
50:13 I don't. I honestly don't know what's
50:15 worse I. Think no, I think.
50:16 What Chris did was. I don't yeah.
50:18 I don't know if there's a worst. I think I think they're awful.
50:21 They're just awful. And just the different scenarios
50:23 like as to how they've gone about their their awfulness.
50:26 Yeah, but I do I lump Marilyn in there.
50:29 I do think that whatever she maybe she didn't know all of it.
50:33 I think she knew enough to not question and not voice things
50:38 and I reckon not question it. I know that that level of
50:42 loyalty is actually is is toxic and not right.
50:46 Yeah. How could you know someone like
50:48 Lynn from I mean, she would have known her from six, the age of
50:52 16. They were all around each other
50:54 from such a young age and know that someone has has done some
50:59 harm to her and they're not they were.
51:02 Really good. Friends, they were close in law,
51:05 they. Lived literally down the road
51:06 from one another they brought up.
51:08 I mean, I think Paul and Marilyn's kids were slightly
51:12 older than than Chris and Lynette, but they they had their
51:17 families together like she was they were.
51:20 Close. Your children's auntie, yes, has
51:25 died at your brother in Yep. Yep, Yep, throughout the 40
51:39 years of from when Lynn disappeared and now we know, you
51:44 know, was murdered up until the the time that the case went to
51:49 trial, there were 12 witnesses that could that provided
51:54 evidence in the years prior right had passed away.
51:58 Oh wow. I don't know.
51:59 It was that many, Yeah. So.
52:00 Much, Yeah, which is, I mean, it's not surprising in that time
52:03 frame, four years. Yeah.
52:04 And among them were, you know. So does that mean any of their
52:08 like if they've given testimony prior like written or you know,
52:11 that there's documented evidence, can that still be read
52:13 into course? Yeah.
52:14 So some of it was admissible. I mean, obviously they must
52:17 have, they must have had to be cross.
52:19 Examined. Can it?
52:20 That was the problem, yeah. So they had to take it article
52:23 by article. And like, you know, obviously
52:26 the defence of would argue as to why it was not admissible.
52:30 It said, yeah, but things like Helena's diary entries, they
52:34 were allowed in. And yeah, they were part of what
52:36 built the circumstantial case against Chris.
52:39 I guess it's up to the police officers then to present that,
52:42 Is that right? To then present the the evidence
52:44 that they've got like, even though there's not a person to
52:47 bring it. Yes, I believe so.
52:48 So the the prosecutor would. Introduce Damian Loan would have
52:52 been on the stand giving that evidence potentially, yeah,
52:54 yeah. So it's it's very, sort of very,
52:57 very interesting. But then also over those 40
52:59 years, and we've spoken about this in other cases as well, a
53:03 lot of evidence, like physical evidence went missing.
53:06 Yeah, things, I mean, over the time, yes, more and more was put
53:09 in that box that originally had one piece of paper.
53:12 But, you know, police stations move and evidence gets lost and
53:16 statements and, you know, go from being paper based to
53:20 digital and things don't get scanned properly.
53:23 So there was stuff like that that happened in this case as
53:26 well. Yeah.
53:27 And then I guess you think about things that that records that do
53:30 get lost, bank statements, phone records, because the other thing
53:34 is, you know, that phone call that supposedly took place at
53:37 the baths on the day that Lynn went missing, that's never been
53:42 able to be proven whether a phone call actually.
53:44 Came in that day or not. Because it wasn't investigated
53:46 at the time and the records, they only have to stay.
53:50 I don't know. Say it's seven years.
53:51 I don't know how long. It is, but it's not 40, you
53:53 know. No, they spoke to the people who
53:55 were working that day at the bars.
53:57 And how do you remember 40 years ago, did you receive a phone
54:01 call and pass the phone on to to Chris?
54:04 I think there was a young, because there was a young girl,
54:06 I think it was, it was working there.
54:07 Who has a recollection of some sort of potentially she's like,
54:11 maybe I called him and said, hey, come to the phone.
54:15 Lynn's on the phone. That's what he says happened.
54:17 And she can't really say yes or no to that.
54:20 She's like, oh, maybe because she goes, I would have
54:22 definitely have done that. Over the course of the time of
54:25 working with Chris at the bath, that exact scenario would have
54:29 occurred. Lynn would have rung him there,
54:31 you know, every second shift potentially.
54:34 And she said I have definitely done that.
54:36 Did I do it on that date? On that day as?
54:40 If you would remember as if. Maybe unless you.
54:43 Kept. But even if you kept, you don't
54:45 know it's. Just yeah.
54:47 Would you have even written that in a journal on that day to say
54:49 you did that? Because at that point in time,
54:51 she wasn't reported missing. It wasn't, like until six weeks
54:54 after the fact that she was reported missing that she could
54:57 have even potentially have been questioned by a police officer.
55:00 And even then, six weeks ago, did you answer a call from Lynn
55:03 again? I don't know.
55:05 Even when, even when the six, you know, even when he reported
55:10 it six weeks later, the police didn't do anything.
55:12 They didn't go and look for witnesses or look to corroborate
55:15 his story at all. No, no.
55:17 You know they didn't. They didn't do that at that
55:19 point even, but even if they had, I think it would have been
55:21 difficult to remember like. Yeah, you better remember who
55:23 you, you know, in a place like that where you're taking phone
55:25 calls all day. Yeah, like I'm because
55:28 especially then there was no mobile phone.
55:29 So any phone calls that were going to be made to employees
55:32 were made at that by that, you know, that phone.
55:34 I'm sure she took a phone call and said to, you know, anyone
55:37 there, you know, at some point, hey, your wife's on the phone or
55:39 your your mum's on the phone or, you know, so it's just yeah, it
55:43 would be impossible to remember that sort of thing.
55:46 But on the phone call situation he said that he had he would
55:49 spoken to Lynn a number of times over those days of those first
55:53 initial days of her missing what So she was ringing you but no
55:56 one else like. That's very convenient.
55:58 And her mum, yeah, didn't call, like, yeah.
56:02 So her mum actually said that. It wasn't in a statement or
56:06 anything I think. I think it was in her journals
56:07 that she was journals. I think she wrote something
56:09 there about. It rather.
56:10 Might have been. He she'd spoken to her, to
56:12 Lynn's brother Greg about it. Yeah, but her mum basically said
56:16 like, Lynn knew I had the girls because she would have known I
56:20 would have taken them. And if she's phoned home to
56:23 Chris and wanted to speak to the girls, he would have said that
56:25 the. Girls, they're telling me, yeah.
56:27 So she would have called. Yeah.
56:28 Like that even, you know, she couldn't believe that.
56:33 Yeah, she couldn't. It wasn't that she couldn't
56:34 believe that. I don't know.
56:37 She. We don't.
56:38 Want. She didn't want to believe that
56:39 was Chris. I can't.
56:40 You know you. Yeah.
56:41 I think you're right. I think she didn't even really
56:44 conceal. I don't know what she when we're
56:46 talking, you know, early 80s, we didn't have the knowledge we
56:50 have now of what's being put together of that, you know,
56:52 these these sorts of domestic violence murders occur and that
56:57 you know, it's perpetrated by people within knowledge of, you
57:00 know, family husbands, you know, those sorts of people are who
57:04 perpetrate this. I think there was still a
57:06 mindset of this sort of thing happens by strangers.
57:08 You know strangers do awful things to us, not people we
57:11 know, whereas we now know that. These sorts of things. 90% of
57:16 the time it is someone who's known and known intimately to
57:20 that person. So with the knowledge of that in
57:23 in our mindset, we would be definitely jumping down that and
57:26 to the point where, you know, you see the husband on on the TV
57:29 when someone goes missing, you're like, oh, looking for
57:32 something because clearly he's suspect number one.
57:34 Yeah, I think in the 80s he wasn't suspect #1 the husband.
57:37 Wasn't, I think, I think you're right.
57:39 And you've got to think about it in that context.
57:41 But it's really hard to think about it, Yeah, from where we're
57:43 sitting right now. Well, in the second trial, I
57:45 find this, that one really hard to put a lens on it of 80s
57:49 compared to us now. Totally, Yeah.
57:52 In that verdict, Justice Harrison stated I'm just going
57:56 to read out what he said about the circumstantial evidence.
57:59 He said the circumstantial evidence in this case,
58:02 considering as a whole is persuasive and compelling.
58:05 None of the circumstances considered alone can establish
58:08 Mr. Dawson's guilt. But when regard is had to the
58:11 combined force, I am left in no doubt.
58:15 I am satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Dawson's
58:18 murder of Lynette is the only rational inference.
58:23 He was resolute. In his absolutely finding
58:27 absolutely no, you know, no, no, no, no, no.
58:32 He was beyond a reasonable doubt, that's for sure.
58:34 I mean, the things that he so the the the evidence that they
58:38 had that they put to court to basically get him to this point
58:42 was witnesses, witness reports of Dawson committing acts of
58:46 violence against Lynn, the deterioration of the marriage.
58:50 Yeah, which was reported by Lynn to lots of different people.
58:54 Yeah. Dawsons affair and infatuation
58:56 with JC witness accounts of Dawsons violent, aggressive and
59:02 controlling behavior and the unlikelihood of Lynette
59:05 disappearing of her own will and leaving her children financial
59:08 access. Yeah, and all possessions
59:10 behind. Yeah.
59:10 She didn't even take a handbag. No wedding rings anything?
59:13 No. So that's that's all the things
59:16 that, you know, Justice Harrison, you know, used in
59:19 order to in order to give the finding that he gave.
59:25 Yes, you want to go to. Well, so the sentencing, did
59:30 you? Oh, did I say?
59:31 I think so. So he was sentenced to 24 years
59:34 in prison with a non parole period of 18 years, which I mean
59:38 doesn't sound like a lot for killing somebody in some ways.
59:41 But I think was being factored in that he had his age at the
59:44 time, I think seventeen, 72574 something.
59:47 Like that he was over 70, old. Yeah.
59:51 So I think that was being factored into the sentencing
59:53 that obviously 24 years, chances are he won't be alive anyway
59:57 and. Even if he gets out, he's gonna
59:59 have no. Yeah, so the the family also
1:00:04 then after this with his. So he's got obviously a parole
1:00:06 period, you know, I think it's 2041 he'd be eligible for
1:00:11 parole. Is this.
1:00:13 And so there's actually they have put into law something that
1:00:18 was there anyway, which we've discussed in another case that
1:00:21 could be used, but now it must be used.
1:00:24 Is this no, no parole, nobody, no parole.
1:00:27 So basically, unless he is going to come up and go, yeah, this is
1:00:32 where Lynn's body is, this is what happened, he cannot be
1:00:35 considered for parole in 18 years anyway.
1:00:37 So that additional six years that's being added, it will be
1:00:40 seen because he's not, he's not talking.
1:00:43 So yeah, we're looking at a full sentence anyway.
1:00:46 But then what came of it too was obviously this JC, what was then
1:00:51 brought, she brought forward a further charge on Chris for the
1:00:57 his cardinal knowledge of of her during her time as a pupil of
1:01:02 his. So this is where the law gets
1:01:04 really icky in terms of what the law was back in 1981 compared to
1:01:11 2020, well 2022 when this was, yeah, this was.
1:01:15 But obviously we have very different knowledge these days
1:01:19 to, you know, children's brain development and when they should
1:01:23 be considered as, you know, having giving consent, etcetera.
1:01:27 But also the fact that this there was this link towards the
1:01:30 fact of not only did this blows my mind that literally someone
1:01:35 could have had sex with this girl who was 16, but not be
1:01:39 their teacher. And that would be OK.
1:01:42 But because he was she was his student and she was under the
1:01:46 age of 17. Sorry.
1:01:48 So that meant that he could he can't have sex with her while
1:01:51 she's while he's her student, But the day she turns 17 and is
1:01:56 or is no longer a student, either of those two things.
1:01:59 So she could be still be 17 and be a be a student, but or the
1:02:03 other way around. And he can have sex with her
1:02:07 then, which that just blows my mind that that law was back
1:02:12 then. So a trial took place.
1:02:15 So that was it was a really she had to prove that she was 16 and
1:02:21 still his student when they first had sex, which would have
1:02:26 just been. Imagine having to as a victim,
1:02:29 having to prove like a horrible like to.
1:02:33 Thankfully, thankfully. Thankfully.
1:02:35 She had friends, she had witnesses.
1:02:39 There was actually. Was there another school teacher
1:02:41 who testified? For her?
1:02:44 Oh, I can't remember. I feel like there was a teacher
1:02:47 or or maybe a school administrator.
1:02:50 Someone who witnessed. Someone who witnessed.
1:02:52 Things there's only people who said like there was witnesses
1:02:54 that said that they came, came into the office, like into Chris
1:02:57 Dawson's office and found him like straddling her on the desk,
1:03:01 you know, and that that was basically like, that's right.
1:03:03 The girl had come in to say I can't do sport today, like, you
1:03:05 know, and put a note on the deck.
1:03:06 He's like, put the note down. Whatever got you go.
1:03:08 They didn't move from their position of being in this
1:03:11 provocative, intimate position. But yeah, like so those
1:03:14 witnesses of those sorts of things, the trolley boy that we
1:03:16 talked about in Episode 1 around how he, you know, bailed him up
1:03:21 at Woolies or whatever and said to him, stay away from her.
1:03:24 That obviously was being very protective of her and that he
1:03:27 was she was his, not someone else's.
1:03:29 Not protective, just office. Yeah, exactly.
1:03:32 Yeah. So there was many witnesses, but
1:03:33 particularly this witness that was named CD who came forward in
1:03:36 this trial where she discussed where she remembers being.
1:03:41 So Chris and Paul ran these fitness classes outside of
1:03:45 school hours and all the girls from the school would be there.
1:03:48 So they would be running these. One of the twins would do like
1:03:51 one song of the fitness class and then they'd swap over and
1:03:54 the other twin would run the class while the other one was in
1:03:57 the backroom with a 16 year old girl.
1:04:00 Now I have also heard. Now I've only actually read this
1:04:03 in one place, but I did read that there were instances where
1:04:09 both men so Chris and Paul in the same room, yes, having sex
1:04:16 with different. Girls.
1:04:17 Girls, yes. So there was sexual like I'm
1:04:21 just getting total White Lotus vibes here.
1:04:24 Have you watched it? Yes yes, Oh my God, Patrick
1:04:27 Schwarzenegger. But Oh my God that is fucking
1:04:32 disgusting. You're having sex with a girl
1:04:35 next to your brother who's also having sex with a girl in the
1:04:37 same room. Ill.
1:04:38 There and there have been allegations that they both then
1:04:42 would participate. Yeah, see, that's, this is the
1:04:44 White Lotus 5 bit. That's the thing, right?
1:04:47 So they're having these this group sex with their brother
1:04:55 like it's bad enough and. Then we're again, we're flicking
1:04:58 back to that beginning of our last episode where you brought
1:05:00 up around that Chequers interview, Chequerboard
1:05:03 interview where they they brought up sexual.
1:05:04 It's not sexual, clearly, but, well, it's not sexual what we
1:05:09 think it might have been. Yeah.
1:05:10 So how long had that been going on between the two of them?
1:05:12 Yeah, I mean, they were talking about that before they had kids.
1:05:16 Yeah, so. Previous, previous, yeah,
1:05:21 because there was, and there was other times where they they were
1:05:23 in the pool together and they'd be one couple down one end of
1:05:25 the pool and you know, Paul and his girl at the time down the
1:05:28 other end of the pool. And we're talking 1617 year old
1:05:31 girls. And we're talking unclothed.
1:05:34 Yeah, At least topless. Yeah, probably.
1:05:37 So again, that was a judge alone trial as well.
1:05:42 And at the end of that, the judge found very clearly that JC
1:05:46 was telling the truth in that she was only 16 and had not
1:05:50 turned 17 and also that at that time she was his student.
1:05:54 So he was convicted of that as well.
1:05:57 He was sentenced for that an additional four years and two
1:06:03 years non parole. I think at the end of the day,
1:06:06 what it actually it only actually added an extra 12
1:06:09 months onto his full sentence. But again, I think no, sorry, 12
1:06:15 months onto his parole ability, right.
1:06:18 But we can't. He's not going to get that
1:06:20 parole. No.
1:06:21 So we're actually talking the full amount.
1:06:23 I think he's now up to about, I want to say he has no chance of
1:06:27 getting out before 2042. If you're 45, it might be yet.
1:06:31 And so he'll be dead by then. Yeah, like, I mean, he's well
1:06:35 into his, well into his 90s by that stage.
1:06:38 So he won't be. He'll be living out his life in.
1:06:40 Prison. He'll be a year off 100, then
1:06:43 he'll be 99, then so will he? No, he'll be early 90.
1:06:49 Yeah. I mean, ultimately because they
1:06:50 had to only, they could only chart like as we're saying that
1:06:53 they could only use the law of the day of when it happened and
1:06:57 not today. And so the judge had to be very
1:06:59 careful around what sentencing that he could give as well,
1:07:03 because it had to be the maximums and things of that law
1:07:07 of that day. Whereas we just know so much
1:07:10 more of that this 16 year old should not be held accountable
1:07:13 at all for any of these and that she was groomed and that that's
1:07:17 wrong. Whereas the lens of the 1980s
1:07:20 was that that that was grooming. They didn't know what grooming
1:07:24 was, you know, so well, that would be as difficult as a
1:07:28 judge, I think. I mean, bad, not hard enough as
1:07:30 us onlookers to because I hear the sentencing for that and go,
1:07:34 that's fucked up. That's so bad.
1:07:36 Appropriate. But it was like woefully low in
1:07:39 the context of the law that was in place at the time they had to
1:07:42 go by, but also the context of his age, taking into account all
1:07:46 those sorts of things. It's kind of what do you expect?
1:07:50 You know, like it's it's going to play out as it's going to
1:07:52 play out that he's going to live out his life in jail.
1:07:54 Yep, as he fucking deserves it. Shits me up the wall that he has
1:07:58 lived the majority of his life outside of those walls of
1:08:01 prison. It's worth saying he remarried
1:08:04 to a woman named Sue. Yes, after his marriage to JC
1:08:09 ended and she's. They're still married to this
1:08:11 day. Yeah.
1:08:13 What? She knew or didn't know?
1:08:15 I mean he lived in QLD so he moved permanently to Queensland
1:08:19 after his relationship breakdown with JC.
1:08:22 He moved to they moved to the Gold Coast.
1:08:24 The two like the two of them did.
1:08:25 JC move back to. I think she must have, yeah.
1:08:29 So, you know, I don't know how much his new wife knew about all
1:08:33 this before it came to the fore, but he would have thought he got
1:08:35 away with. It oh, yeah, 100%.
1:08:37 And the arrogance of him would be that yeah, like, what the
1:08:40 hell? Why are you all talking about
1:08:41 this? This is so long ago.
1:08:42 Like, whatever, Get over it. Yeah.
1:08:44 But then thank God for the teacher's pet, because I really
1:08:47 don't think that this would have come to the fore and I don't
1:08:52 think he'd be in prison right now if it wasn't for Headley's
1:08:54 investigation. Absolutely, yeah.
1:08:57 He managed to flush out so much more of what what it was and to
1:09:00 bring it to the. I don't think that's the thing.
1:09:02 I don't think the DPP would have prosecuted and arrested him if
1:09:07 there wasn't the public interest in it because it was going to
1:09:09 keep being pushed like, you know, calm on.
1:09:11 Are you serious? And.
1:09:11 They're like, you know, it was 40 years ago, like, you know,
1:09:14 and these trials do cost millions of dollars, the
1:09:16 taxpayers millions of dollars. So there's got to be
1:09:18 justification and and good reason to which is fair.
1:09:21 That's fine. Yeah.
1:09:22 But thank God there was that public push.
1:09:25 And the other thing that I've, I've heard Headley interviewed
1:09:28 many times, but one of the things that he says is in cases
1:09:33 like this, the police need to work with investigative
1:09:36 journalists because they have money.
1:09:38 Yeah, they have time. Yeah, they can dedicate, like
1:09:40 Headley dedicated 2 1/2 years solely on the teachers pet.
1:09:45 Yes. So he had, you know, he had the
1:09:47 backing of the Australian. It absolutely worked to their
1:09:50 advantage. Oh, absolutely.
1:09:51 It was worth it. It was worth.
1:09:52 It and all of the ones that he's done that he has done
1:09:55 subsequently because he then went on to do the teachers trial
1:09:57 where he covered the full trial. He's gone on to do Shandy's
1:10:00 story. There's so many the night.
1:10:02 Driver. Night driver.
1:10:03 Yeah, there's so many that he has done that have all led to.
1:10:07 Bronwyn's his. Latest 1 isn't it?
1:10:09 Yeah, Bronwyn, which have all led to some resolution in the
1:10:13 case or some pushing forward of the case.
1:10:15 So, you know, we need to be thinking about investigations of
1:10:20 these things in a different light.
1:10:21 And I think the teachers pet has shown us that that that's, you
1:10:25 know, that's a wonderful thing. The media can be very powerful.
1:10:29 Absolutely, yeah. Last thing I just want to say,
1:10:32 too, was at the trial when he the conviction was read out, did
1:10:38 you know about his response? So he thought the cameras had
1:10:41 been turned off because it was actually he was, he was actually
1:10:44 in prison because he they asked for him to not be brought in all
1:10:47 the time into the courts because he was frail and, you know,
1:10:49 like, so that's hard. No worries.
1:10:50 So he's on video link and he thought that the cameras were
1:10:53 all off on the video link from the courts and he responded
1:10:56 with. Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck fuck.
1:11:00 I just love that that he was pissed off.
1:11:02 Yeah, suck shit mate. Suck shit, yeah, but I mean he
1:11:06 knows he's done it like although he again, he's.
1:11:10 Convinced himself, I reckon that he hasn't done it for some or
1:11:12 something. But yeah, I don't know how you
1:11:14 how do you live your life knowing you've taken your the
1:11:18 mother of your children's life? How do you live with yourself?
1:11:23 And like, at the end of the day, money's money.
1:11:25 I know money's important, but for fuck's sake, if he had a
1:11:28 divorce, Lynn, in 1982, financially they both would have
1:11:31 been fine by now. It would have moved on.
1:11:32 They would have. They would have been OK.
1:11:35 You know that. As I said, they weren't
1:11:36 destitute. Yes, your life changes when you
1:11:39 get divorced. Yes, of course, you don't have
1:11:41 the joint assets of the family. You make the choices you make.
1:11:44 That's it. And.
1:11:45 Like fucking just divorce or don't kill her.
1:11:47 Yep, seriously do. Yeah, it's just seriously.
1:11:52 Seriously. All right.
1:11:54 Should we leave it there? I think we've.
1:11:56 Done. You know what I just realized?
1:11:58 I haven't looked to see what we're investigating next week.
1:12:00 I do. What I know, I know.
1:12:03 But I you know why I know I know this because someone's been
1:12:07 hassling us to do it. I know exactly now that you say
1:12:11 that. I love this so one of our
1:12:13 regular commenters on the on Instagram, I think, Oh no, she's
1:12:17 all over the place. She's she's comments every
1:12:18 Spotify Nicole, otherwise known as nudes.
1:12:22 Love your work. Thanks Nudes, but News has been
1:12:24 very, very, very keen for us to do a particular case.
1:12:27 Every time. She comments should suggest as
1:12:29 I'm still waiting. Well here it comes nudes.
1:12:33 So next week we are doing the Claremont, yes, so.
1:12:39 I actually there is a lot to that case and Oh my God, it's a
1:12:43 heart wrenching one, but it's also one that I feel like has
1:12:47 gotten a bit lost because there was a two, there was a
1:12:50 dramatization. Oh my God, I'll find out this
1:12:54 finally. Look into it.
1:12:56 But I feel like it's one of those cases that sometimes I'll
1:12:59 say it to people and I thought it was quite well known because
1:13:01 I listened to a podcast about it.
1:13:03 But even with. You I followed daily like the
1:13:05 trial like. Yeah, but then people don't know
1:13:08 details, so this might be a good one.
1:13:10 I think actually it's one where you I think in that like the
1:13:12 trial was just starting. You're like, you're on this
1:13:14 right? And I'm like, huh, what?
1:13:16 And I think that was when I got was like, Oh my God, I didn't
1:13:18 know about this one and followed from then on like.
1:13:21 It's good, but yeah, it's a good case.
1:13:22 It is interesting, very interesting, interesting, yes.
1:13:25 So we're looking forward to this one.
1:13:26 It's, yeah, just a big one, but we're here for it.
1:13:29 That's it. And you nudes.
1:13:32 So join us next week for that. It's a big one.
1:13:34 So join us for that. Yeah, please as always, like,
1:13:38 subscribe, send us messages, DMS, follow us on Spotify, on
1:13:44 Apple Podcasts, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, all.
1:13:48 We're all. Everywhere.
1:13:50 If you want to send us an e-mail, you can at 2 Crime, so
1:13:53 they're all written out. TWO [email protected] if
1:13:57 you've got some case suggestions and if you would like to buy us
1:14:01 a coffee, you can do so at buymeacoffee.com/two Crime
1:14:06 Besties. I think I didn't shout out the
1:14:09 other day, but attractive. My friend from work bought us a
1:14:11 couple of coffee, so thanks for that attractor.
1:14:13 I did thank her in person, but you know.
1:14:16 Love that. Thank you.
1:14:16 I love it. I.
1:14:17 Really appreciate it. All good.
1:14:19 Well, stay curious, crime besties, and we'll see you next
1:14:22 week. Bye.
Podbean